|
Presentations
Session
I: Introduction and aims of workshop - setting the scene
Common
Implementation Strategy - Draft mandate for a CIS activity on hydromorphology
Gilles Crosnier, European Commission - DG Environment
[pdf, 221 KB, English]
Session
II: Results of the river basin characterisation with a focus on
hydromorphology
Summary
of the analysis of the WFD Article 5 reports in relation to hydromorphology
[pdf, 587 KB, English]
Preliminary
results from WFD Article 5 reports
[xls, 78 KB, English]
Norwegian
example
[pdf, 11 KB, English]
John Wood, WRc
Hydromorphological
issues in the Danube Basin Analysis Roof Report
Birgit
Vogel, International Commission for the Protection of the Danube
River
[pdf, 5.5 MB, English]
Session
III: Policy integration
Key
issues from the Commission perspective – DG Environment
Gilles Crosnier, European Commission - DG Environment
[pdf, 252 KB, English]
Key
issues from the Commission perspective – DG Tren
Karina Veum European Commission - DG Tren
[pdf, 603 KB, English]
Stakeholder
Statements:
Policy
Integration: Water Framework Directive and hydropower
Jukka Muotka, Eurelectric
[pdf, 314 KB, English]
The
position of the European small hydropower sector
Bernhard Pelikan, European Small Hydropower Association
[pdf, 359 KB, English]
Joint
Statement of the Navigation Task Group
Jan Brooke, European Seaports Organisation
[pdf, 56 KB, English]
Inland
waterway transport – a sustainable and efficient mode of transport
Joerg Rusche, European Barge Union
[pdf, 67 KB, English]
Statement
of the Secretariat of the Central Commission for the Navigation
on the Rhine
[pdf, 38 KB, English]
WFD
Hydromorphology: A Challenge for Policy Integration
Nicoletta Toniutti, WWF - Italy
[pdf, 747 KB, English]
Preliminary
joint environmental NGO input
Eva
Royo Gelabert, WWF Global Freshwater Programme - Europe
[pdf,
295 KB, English]
other
statements:
Statement
of the German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing
[pdf,
47 KB, English]
Session
IV: Assessment Criteria
Introduction
to the technical sessions of the workshop - aims and objectives
of the parallel working groups
Ulrich
Irmer, Federal Environmental Agency - Germany
[pdf, 928 KB, English]
Opportunities
for common approaches in heavily modified watercourses - Experiences
from the joint study of Austria, Finland, Norway, Scotland and Sweden
Mika Marttunen, Finnish Environment Institute - Finland
[pdf, 382 MB, English]
Quantitative
criteria for evaluation of pressures in order to designate the HMWB
Daniela Radulescu, National Administration Apele Romane / Romanian
Waters - Romania
[pdf, 777 KB, English]
Parallel
working groups:
Working
groups risk criteria
Development
of morphological standards in the United Kingdom
Roy Richardson, Scottish Environment Protection Agency - United
Kingdom
[pdf, 573 KB, English]
Assessment
of hydromorphological pressures and impacts in Germany
Jörg Janning, Ministry of Environment Lower Saxony - Germany
[pdf, 1.6 MB, English]
Other
interventions on risk criteria:
Austria
[pdf, 216 KB, English]
Belgium
[pdf, 35 KB, English]
Finland
[pdf, 95 KB, English]
Hungary
[pdf, 1.3 MB, English]
Ireland
[pdf, 161 KB, English]
Latvia
[pdf, 54 KB, English]
Poland
[pdf, 335 KB, English]
Slovenia
[pdf, 274 KB, English]
Sweden
[pdf, 111 KB, English]
The
Netherlands [pdf, 155 KB, English]
United
Kingdom [pdf, 47 KB, English]
Working
groups HMWB criteria
Possible
HMWBs – LSOs in the Aura Hydropower scheme
Tor Simon Pedersen, Water Resources and Energy Directorate –
Norway
[pdf, 71 KB, English]
HMWB:
Preliminary designation in the Czech Republic
Marek Mat’a, DHI Hydroinform – Czech Republic
[pdf, 2.1 MB, English]
General
methodology and economic data in the final process of HMWB classification
Patrick Deronzier, Ministry of Ecology - France
[pdf, 397 KB, English]
Other
interventions on HMWB criteria:
Austria
[pdf, 655 KB, English]
Belgium
[pdf, 35 KB, English]
Ireland
[pdf, 504 KB, English]
Latvia
[pdf, 606 KB, English]
Lithuania
[pdf, 19 KB, English]
Netherlands
[pdf, 59 KB, English]
Poland
[pdf, 364 KB, English]
Portugal
[pdf, 724 KB, English]
Slovac
Republic [pdf, 44 KB, English]
Slovenia
[pdf, 939 KB, English]
Sweden
[pdf, 111 KB, English]
United
Kingdom [pdf, 263 KB, English]
Navigation
Sector [pdf, 71 KB, English]
Session
V: Mitigation measures
Mitigation
measures for new and existing water uses and introduction to the
parallel working groups
Martin
Marsden, Scottish Environment Protection Agency - United Kingdom
[pdf, 136 KB, English]
Mitigation
measures to improve the water quality of rivers used for hydropower
generation
Uli Dumont, Ingenieurbüro Floecksmühle - Germany
[pdf, 1.6 MB, English]
Navigation
and HMWB
Guillaume Demortier, Agence de l'Eau Rhin-Meuse - France
Geraldine Aubert, Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardie - France
[pdf, 748 KB, English]
Parallel
working groups:
Working
groups Hydropower
Mitigation
measures in relation to Hydropower Generation in the Danube basin
Robert Konecny, Federal Environment Agency - Austria
[pdf, 1 MB, English]
Mitigation
measures in the Suldai River Basin Management Plan
Steinar Sandoy, Directorate for Nature Management - Norway
[pdf, 390 KB, English]
Defining
reference conditions and environmental objectives for the heavily
modified river Oulujoki
Seppo Hellsten, Finnish Environment Institute - Finland
Jukka Muotka, Eurelectric
[pdf, 395 KB, English]
Best
practice for impoundments
David Crookall, Scottish Environment Protection Agency - United
Kingdom
[pdf, 914 KB, English]
Other
interventions on hydropower:
Ireland
[pdf, 374 KB, English]
Sweden
[pdf, 15 KB, English]
Working
group navigation
Case
study on using dredged material for mitigating marine navigation
works
Andy Birchenough, The Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture
Science - United Kingdom
[pdf, 1.8 MB, English]
Other
interventions on navigation:
Navigation
Sector
[pdf, 30 KB, English]
Dredging
Sector
[pdf, 1.5 MB, English]
Working
group flood defence & other uses
Mitigation
issues for flood risk management – soft options or hard choices?
Jane
Rawson, Environment Agency - United Kingdom
[pdf, 994 KB, English]
Session
VI: Reports from parallel working groups
Report
from group: Risk criteria I
Nicole Kranz, Ecologic – Institute for International and
European Environmental Policy
[pdf, 36 KB, English]
Report
from group: Risk criteria II
Eleftheria Kampa, Ecologic – Institute for International
and European Environmental Policy
[pdf, 31 KB, English]
Report
from group: HMWB criteria I
David Corbelli, Scottish Environment Protection Agency - United
Kingdom
[pdf, 42 KB, English]
Report
from group: HMWB criteria II
Jane Rawson, Environment Agency - United Kingdom
[pdf, 29 KB, English]
Report
from group: Hydropower I
Eleftheria Kampa, Ecologic – Institute for International
and European Environmental Policy
[pdf, 33 KB, English]
Report
from group: Hydropower II
David Crookall, Scottish Environment Protection Agency - United
Kingdom
[pdf, 29 KB, English]
Report
from group: Navigation
Nicole Kranz, Ecologic – Institute for International and
European Environmental Policy
[pdf, 33 KB, English]
Report
from group: Flood Defence & Other uses
Peter Pollard, Scottish Environment Protection Agency - United
Kingdom
[pdf, 38 KB, English]
Session
VII: Conclusions of the workshop
Conclusions
on policy integration
Robert Hitchen, Department for the Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs - United Kingdom
[pdf, 425 KB, English]
Conclusions
on assessment criteria
Ulrich Irmer, Federal Environmental Agency – Germany
[pdf, 414 KB, English]
Conclusions
on mitigation measures
Joyce Carr, Scottish Executive - United Kingdom
[pdf, 439 KB, English]
Follow
up activities
Gilles
Crosnier, European Commission - DG Environment
[pdf, 409 KB, English]
|
